Appendix F: Appendix Tables of Chapter Six
appendix f: appendix tables of chapter six
table 1 comparison of the four groups in terms of each metacognitive listening awareness aspec for cycle 1
note. mean dif. =mean difference; pe=planning-evaluation; da=directed attention; pk=person knowledge; mt=mental translation; ps=problem solving.
table 2 comparison of the four groups in terms of each metacognitive listening awareness aspect for cycle 2
note. mean dif. =mean difference; pe=planning-evaluation; da=directed attention; pk=person knowledge; mt=mental translation; ps=problem solving.
table 3 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive listening awareness and listening comprehension for cycle 1
note. group a=listening one time; group b=listening three times; group c=schema raising+listening three times; group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05.
table 4 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive listening awareness and listening comprehension for cycle 2
note. group a=listening one time; group b=listening three times; group c=schema raising+listening three times; group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05.
table 5 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group a in cycle 1
note. group a=listening one time; a=cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant; *p＜.05.
table 6 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group b in cycle 1
note. group b=listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 7 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group c in cycle 1
note. group c=schema raising+listening three times; *p＜.05.
table 8 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group d in cycle 1
note. group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 9 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group a in cycle 2
note. group a=listening one time; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 10 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group b in cycle 2
note. group b=listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 11 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group c in cycle 2
note. group c=schema raising+listening three times; a=cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant.
table 12 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group d in cycle 2
note. group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 1 comparison of the four groups in terms of each metacognitive listening awareness aspec for cycle 1
note. mean dif. =mean difference; pe=planning-evaluation; da=directed attention; pk=person knowledge; mt=mental translation; ps=problem solving.
table 2 comparison of the four groups in terms of each metacognitive listening awareness aspect for cycle 2
note. mean dif. =mean difference; pe=planning-evaluation; da=directed attention; pk=person knowledge; mt=mental translation; ps=problem solving.
table 3 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive listening awareness and listening comprehension for cycle 1
note. group a=listening one time; group b=listening three times; group c=schema raising+listening three times; group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05.
table 4 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive listening awareness and listening comprehension for cycle 2
note. group a=listening one time; group b=listening three times; group c=schema raising+listening three times; group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05.
table 5 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group a in cycle 1
note. group a=listening one time; a=cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant; *p＜.05.
table 6 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group b in cycle 1
note. group b=listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 7 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group c in cycle 1
note. group c=schema raising+listening three times; *p＜.05.
table 8 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group d in cycle 1
note. group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 9 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group a in cycle 2
note. group a=listening one time; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 10 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group b in cycle 2
note. group b=listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.
table 11 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group c in cycle 2
note. group c=schema raising+listening three times; a=cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant.
table 12 pearson correlations of the participants' metacognitive awareness and their vocabulary acquisition for group d in cycle 2
note. group d=inferencing training+listening three times; *p＜.05; **p＜.01.